Skip to main content

Julian of Norwich

Denys Turner's 'The Darkness of God: Negativity in Christian Mysticism'  http://www.amazon.co.uk/Darkness-God-Negativity-Christian-Mysticism/dp/0521645611/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1317062240&sr=8-2 is one of those works that transform your understanding of its subject matter by making the familiar productively strange.

He convincingly demonstrates that the category of 'mystical experience' as a discrete psychological happening, that is so wonderfully drawn by William James and adopted by much subsequent exploration, would have been alien to the medieval mind. For them mysticism was not a privileged set of experiences (over against other kinds of 'normal' experience) but a way of being towards the totality of reality: a transformation of the way of navigating all experience.

Mysticism is not a discrete form of theology relating to our interior, private spaces but a fully fledged way of approaching the totality of our understanding: public and private.

It is deep pleasure, therefore, that I discovered in Blackwells' bookshop. whilst browsing, that he has written a book on Julian of Norwich and one that sees her not as an explorer of 'spirituality' (though she is that) but as a fully fledged theologian grappling with a whole spectrum of ways of appropriating the truth.

I bought it forthwith!

I have always found that 'clutch' of disparate English mystical writers: Julian, Walter Hilton and the author of the Cloud of Unknowing deeply engaging. It is the blend of robust thought and modesty that is attractive: the lack of system (or alternatively complex categorized imagery). They are not, to be parochial about it, Spanish! Neither St Teresa of Avila nor St John of the Cross undoubted depth has ever charmed. I am probably inherently shallow (but if so I share my predicament with Thomas Merton who likewise declared a preference for the homeliness of the English fourteenth century mystics)!


I especially like the way in which they champion orthodoxy and then proceed to thoroughly undermine any straightforward understanding of it. Julian disguises her radical nature under protestations, skilfully deployed, of being a 'mere' woman.

Meanwhile, Hilton takes regular side-swipes at assorted 'heretics' whilst telling us that it is not what we hold true that essentially matters but the way in which our truth is held. Even if a certain statement is true if we use it to belittle or batter a brother, it becomes false. Any truth worthy of the title can only be wielded in love!

Comments

  1. This is too much. You seem to be in some sort of brilliant writing zone these days. This is so good. Perhaps I am just as shallow and hence like the way you describe and defend we anglo-shallows over against the depths of the Spanish. OMG as texters say. How could you dare say such things? You risk re-opening centuries of mystical warfare among the nations, the national characters, the old empires. The championing of orthodoxy with the immediate undermining of it--there again you demonstrate the immense appeal of the shallow. But if Merton is noisy shallow then Lax is the superior quiet shallow, or as he puts it so well in one poem, how one simply draws a straight line over and over until it beocmes a circle.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That is a beautiful image of Lax's!

    At times, I find myself wishing they were Irish or Belgian or something as it is a mite embarrassing, tainting my preference for this particular group with the characteristic 'English'!

    Yet they are precisely this in the way they disguise their depths of erudition and understanding in simple, almost apologetic forms.

    And you can imagine dropping by Julian's anchorage for a cup of tea and a slice of toast, her cat purring in your lap, in homely comfortableness. Going out for a pint with St John of the Cross???

    I love that phrasing of Walter Hilton's about the way you hold truth being an integral part of truth: any fundamentalism is dissolved in the necessity for love of neighbour.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Buddha meets Christ in embrace

Reading Lama Anagarika Govinda is proving nostalgic on a number of fronts. I recall my first reading of it in my first year at university, bought at Watkins, the famous 'esoteric' bookshop in Cecil Court in London. I sat in my hall of residence room transfixed by a world made familiar; and, it was deepening of a commitment to contemplation (which has been observed fitfully)! I remember returning, at the time, to my school to give a talk to the combined fifth form on Buddhism and using Govinda as the backbone of my delivery (both this book, and his equally wonderful, the Foundations of Tibetan Buddhism). I was voted (I immodestly remember) their best invited speaker of the year. I had even bought a recording of Tibetan music as opener and closer! He reminded me of how important Buddhism was (and is) to my own thinking and comprehension of my experience. The Buddha's First Sermon in the Deer Park was the first religious text I read (of my own volition) at the tender age...

Red Shambala

Nicholas Roerich is oft depicted as a spiritual seeker, peace visionary, author of numberless paintings, and a brave explorer of Central Asia. However, Andrei Znamenski in his 'Red Shambala: Magic, Prophecy, and Geopolitics in the Heart of Asia' has him perform another role - that of geopolitical schemer. The scheming did have at its heart a religious vision - of a coalition of Buddhist races in Central Asia that would establish a budding utopia - the Shambala of the title - from which the truths of Buddhism (and co-operative labour) would flow around the globe. This would require the usurpation of the 13th Dalai Lama to be replaced by the Panchen Lama guided by the heroic saviour (Roerich) who appears above dressed for the part. In the achievement of these aims, the Roerichs (including his wife, Helena, who had a visionary connection with 'Mahatmas' whose cryptic messaging guided their steps) were willing to entertain strange bedfellows that at one time include...

The Jewel in the Crown

I spent six months in Nizhny Novgorod ostensibly as both the chair and the director of a micro-finance fund. I must confess much of that work -apart from the spectacular resignation of my predecessor as director - has faded from view but what I vividly recall is at weekends progressing through Paul Scott's 'The Raj Quartet' and subsequently re-watching its painstaking and triumphant dramatization (by Granada) that I had watched, long before, on the television. It was without doubt my most deeply cherished reading experience to date. This extraordinary narrative of the British in the last, declining days of colonial rule that begins with the doomed relationship of Hari Kumar and Daphne Manners, her rape, and the injustice of Kumar as accused by Ronald Merrick, the Police Superintendent, and one of the most malevolent characters ever created in fiction. He is a magnified alter ego of Scott himself especially the sharply, destructively repressed homosexuality. The narrati...